The Wage Penalty and Obesity

February 7th, 2013 No comments »


Workers who are obese receive lower wages than their non-obese peers, especially white women working in firms which provide health insurance for their employees.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) prohibits employers from varying employee contributions based on health related factors. The current HIPAA provisions provide an exception which allows employers to vary contributions if they participate in employee wellness programs. The proposed regulation under the ACA expands the amount of the penalty/incentive to up to 30% of the cost of the employee’s health insurance premium for those meeting specified biometric targets, including Body Mass Index (BMI) or related weight metric.

Since this provision broadens the exception to the non-discrimination provisions, it is important to consider the extent, insofar as it can be determined of existing discrimination against persons because of their body weight. An expansion of the HIPAA provision should then be read in context of increasing the penalty paid by some employees for their excess body weight.

The justification for the ACA provision was that employees with poor lifestyle behaviors, especially smoking and obesity, should bear more of the employer-paid health insurance costs or demonstrate their efforts in making lifestyle changes in voluntary or mandatory wellness programs. Current research indicates that this premise is not accurate.

So who are most affected by these programs?

The biometrics used in such programs, include obesity, elevated triglycerides and blood pressure, are part of what is known as the metabolic syndrome. Approximately 34% of adults meet the National Cholesterol Education Program’s criteria for the metabolic syndrome. Older males and females from 40-59 years of age are about 3 times as likely as those 20-39 to meet the criteria for the metabolic syndrome. Males and females over 60 were more than 4 and 6 times respectively to meet the criteria. Overweight and obese males were 6 and 32 times as likely as normal weight males to the meet the criteria and overweight and obese females were 5 and 17 times as likely to meet the criteria. (See, Ervin RB, Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States, 2003-2006. National Health Statistics Reports; No. 13. National Health Statistics metabolic syndrome – PubMed Results )

The prevalence of obesity and hypertension has significantly increased in non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Blacks in both men and women. Non-Hispanic Blacks have the highest prevalence of obesity and hypertension. Diabetes is increasing overall with Mexican-Americans showing the higher rates. Smoking is declining in all groups. Romero CX, et al, Changing Trends in the Prevalence and Disparities of Obesity and Other Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Three Racial/Ethnic Groups of USA Adults. Adv Prev Med. 2012:172423.

It has been long recognized that workers who are obese face discrimination in the workplace in terms of hiring and promotion. Giel KE, et al. Weight bias in work settings – a qualitative review. Obes Facts 2010 Feb;3(1):33-40.

It has also been known for some time that white female workers are paid less than their normal weight peers for the same work. This is known as the wage penalty. See Lempert D, Women’s Increasing Wage Penalties from being overweight and Obese, Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 414, 2007, December.

The study by Jay Bhattacharya and M. Kate Bundorf of the Stanford University School of Medicine looked at the issue: Who pays the healthcare costs associated with obesity? Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, they made some startling findings:

  1. Workers who are obese and who receive health insurance through their employers earn lower wages than their non-obese peers.

  2. Workers who are obese and at firms not providing health insurance earn about the same as their thinner colleagues.

  3. A substantial part of these wage penalties at firms offering insurance can be explained by the difference between obese and non-obese in expected medical care costs.

  4. The obese with employer-sponsored health coverage bear the full cost of the incremental medical care associated with obesity, approximately $732.

Thus, their study finds that while it is nominally employers who pay for health insurance premiums, it is really employees who bear the cost of employer-sponsored insurance.  Further, the wages of obese workers are lower than those of their normal weight peers, and in the case of white women, the relationship appears to be causal.  It is obese white women who bear the burden of lower wages due in part to the higher costs of insuring these workers. In firms providing employer based health insurance, obese women experience a wage penalty of $2.64 per hour. The penalty comes out to $5,784, above the average individual health insurance premium or 1/3 of a family premium.   In firms which do not provide health insurance, there is no significant wage penalty.

Not surprisingly, men and women with obesity report a higher percentage of common medical conditions, including diabetes, asthma, hypertension, non-specific joint pain and arthritis. Women with obesity are nearly 10% more likely to have arthritis than their non-obese peers, while for men with obesity, the differential is only 6%. It is only for arthritis that obese individuals spend more than thin individuals. They state, “For female workers with arthritis, the medical expenditure difference between obese and thin individuals is $1,956; for male workers with arthritis, the difference is $1,224. Clearly, differences between men and women are an important part of the reason why obese female workers spend so much more on medical care than thin female workers, while obese male workers spend about the same as thin male workers.” The authors calculate the yearly wage penalty on obese women employed in firms providing health insurance is $5,784. Bhattacharya J, Bundorf, MK, The incidence of the healthcare costs of obesity, Journal of Health Economics 2009 May;28(3):649-58.

Two points from this study are critical. First, women with obesity already pay their health insurance premium through a reduction in wages. Thus, a mandatory health contingent program in which the employee is penalized for not attaining an employer determined health metric, such as BMI, actually has the worker paying up to 130% of the health insurance premium. It is this figure which is the true impact of the proposed rule.

Second, the medical conditions of men and women with obesity such as asthma, arthritis, hypertension, etc. can make physical activity difficult or impossible, due to both the physical limitations of such conditions as well as the time and out-of-pocket costs of managing these conditions.

The wage penalty may actually be higher, especially for both men and women at the upper end of the BMI spectrum. In a paper published in 2011, Lisa Powell and colleagues found that a one-unit increase in BMI is directly associated with 1.83% lower hourly wages for women. Late-teen obesity is indirectly associated with 3.5% lower hourly wage for both men and women. Therefore, the wage penalty is significantly larger than previous studies indicated. Han E, Norton EC, Powell LM, Direct and indirect effects of body weight on adult wages. Economics & Human Biology 2011 Dec;4(11):381-392.

The wage penalty may explain the greater perception of employment discrimination among persons with obesity. In one study, results indicate that women are over 16 times more likely than men to perceive employment related discrimination and identify weight as the basis for their discriminatory experience. In addition, overweight respondents were 12 times more likely than normal weight respondents to report weight-related employment discrimination, obese respondents 37 times more likely, and severely obese respondents more than 100 times more likely. Roehling M, Roehling P, Pichler S, The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: the role of sex and race. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71; 2 (Oct 2007);300-318.

 

Obesity Costs Exceeding Smoking

April 19th, 2012 No comments »

Researchers at the Mayo Clinic have found significantly higher costs associated with obesity, especially morbid obesity, than smoking. Smokers had average health costs $1,275 higher than non-smokers but the added costs for persons with morbid obesity were $5,500 per year. http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=338975&type=newswires

Full study appears at:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361992

 

Michelle Obama Changing Military Food Choices

February 9th, 2012 No comments »

Reuters has reported that Michelle Obama will join in an announcement of new nutrition standards for the armed forces 1,100 dining facilities. Over a quarter of eligible 17-24 year olds are too overweight to join the military. Once in, members of the military are gaining too much weight. Department of Defense officials describe this as a “national security problem.” The military spends about $4.65 billion on food services each year and an estimated $1.1 billion on medical care associated with excess weight and obesity. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2E8D90AO20120209

The military’s struggle with obesity has always been an interesting one. It is probably the largest sub-group in the US population with a high number of young people and a culture most supportive of physical activity. In addition, exceeding the different services’ weight standards can result in loss of a career. So, with all that, one would think it would have it’s weight problem pretty well under control. Yet, it isn’t which is probably due to the fact that it is not as isolated from the rest of society. In addition, the physical work of soldiers and sailors have given way to more and more technologically based skills.  Nonetheless, fighting wars, repeated deployments and family issues drives up stress. Obesity rates of US soldiers has doubled since the start of the Iraq war. Families are also affected. Tens of thousands of spouses have had bariatric surgery costing $363 million over ten years. Military spent $363million on WEIGHT-LOSS surgery for obese soldiers’ wives over last ten years | Mail Online One spouse reported becoming depressed and engaging in emotional eating and finally losing 118 pounds.

The future problems for military recruitment are very serious. John Cawley and JC Maclean have calculated that from 1959-2008 the percentage of the population ineligible for service more than doubled for men and tripled for women. They estimate that a 1% rise in weight and body fat would further reduce eligibility by over 850,000 men and 1.3 million women. Unfit for service: the implications of rising ob… [Health Econ. 2011] – PubMed – NCBI

War on the Obese – More Employers To Impose Penalties

November 17th, 2011 No comments »

Reed Abelson of the New York Times reports that that higher penalties for employees who are obese are coming. He writes, “Policies that impose financial penalties on employees have doubled in the last two years to 19 percent of 248 major American employers recently surveyed. Next year, Towers Watson, the benefits consultant that conducted the survey, said the practice – among employers with at least 1,000 workers – was expected to double again. “ Smokers Penalized With Health Insurance Premiums – NYTimes.com The article looks closely at penalties imposed by  Wal-Mart on smokers.

The enhanced penalties are the result of the Affordable Care Act. Led by Steve Burd, CEO of Safeway Inc. a broad business coalition pushed a  provision (of course called a “wellness” provision in Washington-speak) to allow employers to charge overweight employees higher health insurance premiums than those meeting the employer’s weight standard. President Barack Obama applauded incorporating this “Republican idea” into his health care reform legislation Republican Ideas Included in the President’s Proposal | The White House.

Severe Obesity’s Personal, Financial Toll

May 31st, 2011 No comments »

Persons with severe or morbid obesity are hardly the lazy, indifferent people as they are often portrayed. Instead, as we see from this survey by the Canadian Obesity Network, they repeatedly try to lose weight in spite of frustrating disappointments, at great personal costs to themselves. They do not live in a bubble but realize the serious effects excess weight is causing in their careers, interpersonal relationships and self-esteem. Impact of Severe Obesity Felt Far Beyond Physical – Financial Burden and Emotional Implications Also Significant | Canadian Obesity Network

Overweight and Obesity cost US,Canada $300 Billion

January 12th, 2011 No comments »

A Society of Actuaries extensively researched study puts obesity and overweight costs due to mortality, medical costs, disability and lost productivity at $300 billion per year for the United States and Canada. Approximately $80 billion a year is due attributable to overweight and $220 billion due to obesity. http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/research-2011-obesity-relation-mortality.pdf

More on Costs of Obesity

October 4th, 2010 No comments »

Eric Finkelstein and colleagues have published new data adding to the considerable literature about the economic costs of obesity. Using the 2006 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the National Health and Wellness survey, they estimated per capita medical expenditures and the value of lost productivity, including absenteeism and presenteeism. For men, the estimates  of excess costs ranged from under $322 for overweight men to $6, 087 for those with grade III (severe) obesity. For women, estimates of excess costs ranged from $979 for overweight women to $6,694 for those with grade III obesity. The aggregated annual costs attributable to obesity among full-time employees is $73.1 billion. Individuals with a body mass index of 35 or greater represented 37% of the obese population but 61% of excess costs. See The Costs of Obesity in the Workplace. [J Occup Environ Med. 2010] – PubMed result

Updates

September 27th, 2010 No comments »

July 28,2010                                                                                                                      
Child exposure to food ads may be declining. A new study indicates that daily average exposure to  food ads between 2003 and 2007 fell by 13.7% among young children age 2-5 and 3.7% among 6-11 years old but increased by 3.7% among 12-17 year olds. Exposure to sweet food ads was down as were beverage ads “with a substantial decline in the most heavily advertised sugar-sweetened beverages.” Exposure to fast food ads increased. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20603457″>Trends in Exposure to Television Food Advertisemen… [Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010] – PubMed result

July 24, 2010

Analyses throw doubts on fruits and vegetables, physical activity to control obesity. A review of the relationship between fruit and vegetable intake with adult and childhood obesity casts doubt on how strong it the relationship with weight management. The review was undertaken by TA LeDoux and colleagues from the Department of Pediatrics at the USDA/Agricultural Research Service Childrens’ Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine. They found that, after reviewing 772 studies, increased food and vegetable consumption (in conjunction with other behaviors) contributed to reduced adiposity among overweight or obese adults but no association was shown among children. While the quality of the studies varied widely, the relationship between high fruit and vegetable consumption and low obesity among “was weak” and among children “unclear.” The study can be accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633234″>Relationship of fruit and vegetable intake with ad… [Obes Rev. 2010] – PubMed result

In a separate study, doctors in Plymouth, United Kingdom following 202 children for 7 to 10 years, found that overweight preceded physical inactivity, not the other way around.  As most childhood obesity interventions assume inactivity precedes obesity, this study, if validated, indicates a change in strategy to combat childhood obesity. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20573741″>Fatness leads to inactivity, but inactivity does n… [Arch Dis Child. 2010] – PubMed result

July 22, 2010
The Department of Health and Human Services today announced regulations implementing provisions of the health care reform legislation signed into law in March by President Obama. The regulations strengthen the rights of consumers to appeals claims denials and recissions. In addition, an external review procedure will be available to review initial claims decisions. Many persons with obesity have had problems in getting insurance coverage of bariatric surgery and other interventions and have been frustrated with the appeals process.  Plans that pre-existed enactment of health care reform and have not changed are considered ‘grandfathered’ and are exempt from these regulations unless their plans change. See more at http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/07/20100722a.html”>Administration Announces New Affordable Care Act Measures to Protect Consumers and Put Patients Back in Charge of Their Care

July 21, 2010

Because of ‘stealth’ provision, millions will see an expansion of intensive counseling for obesity. See The Daily Downey.
April 30, 2010

Gallup Survey of over 670,000 Americans finds obesity rates continue to rise. Americans Making No Progress on Obesity

April 7, 2010

Consumer Alert: FDA issues warning on “fat burning” injections using such names as mesotherapy, lipozap, lipotherapy, or injection lipolysis. Seehttp://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2010/nida-28.htmFDA Issues Warning Letters for Drugs Promoted in Fat Elimination Procedure

March 31, 2010

Orexigen Therapeutics Submits new obesity drug to FDA for approval Orexigen(R) Therapeutics Submits Contrave(R) New Drug Application to FDA for the Treatment of Obesity

March 31, 2010

Department of Health and Human Services addresses similarities between obesity and addiction. Common Mechanisms of Drug Abuse and Obesity, March 28, 2010 News Release – National Institutes of Health (NIH)

WHAT DOES HEALTH CARE REFORM MEAN FOR OBESITY?

Questions and Answers

By Morgan Downey, J.D.

March 23, 2010

With Sunday’s vote in the House of Representatives, the long-awaited health care reform legislation is on track become law. A great deal has been written about health care reform during the past year but little attention has been paid to how reform might affect the obesity epidemic.

Obesity is the most prevalent, fatal, chronic disease in the United States. 68% of American adults are overweight or obese, constituting a majority of the US population. This Q&A is not intended to cover the entire scope of the health care reform legislation but only to explain how it is likely to affect persons with obesity and the future of the obesity epidemic. (N.B. At several points, the legislation incorporates recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) meaning that these recommendations become covered services. The USPSTF has two obesity specific recommendations at level B: one for screening for obesity and the second for intensive behavioral counseling. The intensive behavioral counseling could open the door for extensive new services.)

1. What does the bill do to help the millions of Americans with obesity?

Briefly:If you have obesity, have a medical condition and have not had health insurance for six months, you will be able to purchase coverage through a temporary high risk pool. (The pool is ‘temporary’ until the health exchanges are implemented).

If you have obesity and receive Medicare or Medicaid, you will see more preventive services fully covered.

If you have obesity and employer provided health insurance several provisions may affect you.

A. If you have had claims denied because of a pre-existing condition (either obesity or an obesity-related co-morbid condition), you should have an easier time getting such claims paid starting in 2014.

B. If you have reached lifetime caps on coverage, within six months of enactment, insurers will be prohibited from placing lifetime limits on the dollar value of coverage and from rescinding coverage, except in the case of fraud. Insurance companies will also be prohibited from canceling policies on people who get sick. (These are called recissions and ‘height and weigh’ is one of the four most common health reasons for a recissions according to a December 2009 report from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners).

C. Six months after enactment, private, qualified health plans will have to provide, without cost-sharing, preventive services with an A or B recommendation of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

D. More expensive “Cadillac” health plans will start being taxed in 2018. To the extent that these plans may provide coverage of bariatric surgery and related services, they may scale back.

2. Is it all good?

Briefly, yes and no.

If you have obesity and have employer-paid health insurance, you may be paying more – potentially a lot more-for it. While the new law will ban discrimination on the basis of health status, an exception exists whereby persons in an employee wellness program can be charged up to 50% of the value of their health insurance premium if they do not meet specific health criteria, such as weight. Intensive behavioral counseling for obesity will become more available. Whether insurers will have to provide bariatric surgery or drugs for treating obesity will be decided by a Health Benefits Advisory Board which will make recommendations to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Third, the tax deduction for medical expenses will change. Currently, individuals can deduct unreimbursed medical expenses (including physician recommended weight loss costs) to the extent they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income. The threshold will rise to 10%. This potentially hurts individuals with multiple chronic conditions and/or high, unreimbursed medical costs.

3. Does Medicare coverage of obesity change?

Medicare beneficiaries would receive a comprehensive health risk assessment and a personalized prevention plan. Incentives would be provided to Medicare beneficiaries to compete behavioral modification programs.Medicare’s current coverage of bariatric surgery does not change.The ban for drugs to treat obesity under Part D continues in effect.

4. What about coverage of obesity in Medicaid?

Current state-by-state coverage in Medicaid for bariatric surgery and drugs to treat obesity should not change. (Medicaid may cover drugs for obesity if the state applies for a waiver from a prohibition in the Medicaid statute.)

The Medicaid program will go through its largest expansion since its inception. If cost-sharing is removed for covered recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force (see above), state Medicaid programs will have their federal matching rates increased. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) is also instructed to develop preventive and obesity-related services for Medicaid enrollees, including obesity screening and counseling for children and adults. Each state is directed to develop a public awareness campaign to educate Medicaid enrollees regarding the “availability and coverage of such services with the goal of reducing incidences of obesity.”

HHS will develop incentives to encourage behavioral change in Medicaid enrollees. A new state option will be developed for Medicaid, allowing enrollees with multiple chronic conditions to select a medical home.

5. What does the law do about childhood obesity?

While often overlooked, the expanding coverage includes providing health insurance to millions of children whose parents do not have coverage now. For the increasing numbers of children and adolescents with obesity, their related conditions, like type 2 diabetes and hypertension, will now be covered. Starting in 6 months, children cannot be denied coverage because of pre-existing conditions. In addition to the coverage components, the law provides funding for a childhood obesity demonstration project.

6. What about prevention of obesity?

The bill establishes a National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council to coordinate federal prevention, wellness and public health activities and develop a national strategy to improve the nation’s health. The strategy is due one year after the enactment. A Prevention and Wellness Trust is authorized to carry out the national strategy. A grant program is developed for 5 years to support the delivery of evidence-based and community based prevention and wellness service aimed at reducing chronic disease rates.

Under Section 4201, the Secretary of HHS shall develop a competitive grant program for states and local governments for “the implementation, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based community preventive health activities in order to reduce chronic disease rates, prevent the development of secondary conditions and address health disparities.”

i. This includes creating healthier school environments, including increasing healthy food options, physical activity opportunities, promotion of health lifestyle, emotional wellness, and prevention curricula.”

ii. Also included are “developing and promoting programs targeting a variety of age levels to increase access to nutrition, physical activity;”

iii. “assessing and implementing worksite wellness programming and incentives; working to highlight healthy options at restaurants and other food venues.

iv. Grantees must report changes in weight, nutrition, physical activity.

b. Section 4202(a) provides a health aging program. Grants are to be provided to states and local governments for the 55 to 64 year old population “to improve nutrition, increase physical activity.” Covered are screenings to identify those with risk factors for cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke and diabetes.” Those identified with such risk factors are to be referred to clinical services.

c. Section 4202(b) provides for an evaluation and plan for community-based prevention and wellness programs for Medicare beneficiaries to reduce their risk of disease, disability and injury by making healthy lifestyle choices, including exercise, diet and self-management of chronic diseases.

7. Does the law affect research on obesity?

a. The bill establishes a non-profit Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to identify research priorities and conduct research which compares the clinical effectiveness of medical treatments. This is effective on enactment.

b. Section 4301 provides for research on optimizing the delivery of public health services.

c. Section 399MM1 provides for studies of worksite health policies and programs. No part of such recommendations, data or assessments can be used to mandate requirements for workplace wellness programs.

d. Section 4402 also provides for effectiveness research of health and wellness programs for federal employees.

e. Under the reconciliation changes passed by the House of Representatives and on its way for approval by the Senate, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid will identify the most cost-intensive services for Medicare which shall ‘inform’ research priorities within the Department of Health and Human Service to improve prevention, treatment or cure of such diseases and conditions.

8. What are the other parts of the bill affect obesity?

The Secretary of HHS is mandated to develop, within one month of passage, an education and outreach campaign regarding preventive health services. The campaign must address proper nutrition, regular exercise and obesity reduction. It is mandated that the Secretary develop a website for health care providers and consumers to provide science-based information on guidelines for nutrition, exercise, obesity reduction and specific chronic disease prevention. Another website is to be developed with a “personalized prevention plan tool. This would include determining individual disease risk, based in part on Body Mass Index.

a. Of particular value for persons with morbid obesity, Section 4203 provides for the removal of barriers to medical devices for individuals with disabilities. Under this provision, standards will be developed to ensure that medical diagnostic equipment used in physician’s offices, clinics, hospitals and other medical settings to ensure that the equipment is accessible to and usable by individuals with accessibility needs to allow independent entry to and use of such equipment.

b. Restaurants which are part of a chain of 20 or more locations doing business under the same name must disclose for ‘standard menu items’ the nutrient content including calories in the item with the suggested daily caloric intake on the menu as well as a drive-through menu board. Self-service items must also display the calorie information. Restaurants and others, such as vending machine operators, may voluntary register to be part of the program. Regulations must be issued within a year of enactment.

c. In some studies, breast-feeding has been found to be preventive for the development of obesity in the child. For breast-feeding women, employers with over 50 employees must a reasonable break time to express breast milk for one year after the child’s birth, each time the employee has a need to express the milk and a place, other than a bathroom that is shielded from view and free from intrusion. Employers need not provide compensation for such time.

d. The Secretary of Labor is authorized to set up a grant program for employer wellness programs. Behavioral change is encouraged which provides for altering employee healthy lifestyles through counseling, seminars, on-line programs or self-help materials. Obesity is specifically listed as a focus. Participation cannot be mandated or conditioned on obtaining a health insurance premium discount, rebate or other financial reward.

9. What is not in the bill?

A proposed tax on sugar-sweetened beverages is not in the legislation.

10. What next?

The bill is large and complex. Many issues, especially regarding inclusion of surgery and drugs in health benefit plans, be have to be resolved by regulations from the Department of Health and Human Services. For example, while the USPSTF recommendation for intensive behavioral counseling does not include frequency, intensity and duration. These will need to be specified.

March 20, 2010

Employers are increasingly using punitive measures against employees’ health status according to annual Hewitt Associates annual survey of 600 U.S. companies. Over half of employers plan to monitor employee behavioral changes or behavioral modification. http://www.hewittassociates.com/Intl/NA/en-US/AboutHewitt/Newsroom/PressReleaseDetail.aspx?cid=8219″>Hewitt Survey Shows Employers Continuing to Invest in Health of Workers Despite Uncertainty of Future Health Care Landscape – Hewitt Associates – Human Resources Consulting and Outsourcing – About Hewitt – Newsroom

March 19, 2010

Extreme Obesity increases in children

A new study from Kaiser Permanente finds alarming increases in extreme obesity in children. Using electronic medical records of 710,949 patients ages 2 to 19 enrolled in Kaiser health programs in Southern California, researchers found about 6.4% of children have extreme obesity. (The researchers used a relatively new definition of extreme obesity from the Centers for Disease Control of 120% of the 95 percentile of weight for age). 7.3% of boys and 5.5% of girls were described as have extreme obesity. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-18/extreme-obesity-found-in-6-4-of-children-kaiser-study-finds.html”>Extreme Obesity Found in 6.4% of Children, Kaiser Study Finds – BusinessWeek

Does increasing physically activity in kids prevent obesity in adults?

Many campaigns for the prevention of obesity in children, including efforts of First Lady Michelle Obama,  stress physical activity under the belief that patterns of physical activity will continue through life and will avoid obesity. It may not be that easy. A study out of Canada followed 374 participants age 7 to 18 years of age for 22 years. They found that only 18% of the most physically active children remained physically active in later life. In contrast 38% of the heaviest children, by BMI, continued to have a high BMI as adults. 83% of overweight youth remained overweight as adults while 85% of adults were not overweight as children. Almost all healthy weight adults had been healthy weight as children. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19922043″>Tracking of obesity and physical activity from chi… [Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009] – PubMed result. Earlier studies found that physical activity in adolescence may track into adulthood for women but not for men. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672846″>Risk of obesity in relation to physical activity t… [Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006] – PubMed result.

March 18, 2010

The STOP Obesity Alliance conducted a press conference on March 16, 2010, releasing a survey of physicians and patients on primary care for patients with obesity as well as a white paper on the topic. See, http://www.stopobesityalliance.org/newsroom/press-releases/”>http://www.stopobesityalliance.org/newsroom/press-releases/</a> and,

http://www.stopobesityalliance.org/wp-content/assets/2010/03/STOP-Obesity-Alliance-Primary-Care-Paper-FINAL.pdf

http://www.stopobesityalliance.org/wp-content/assets/2010/03/STOP-Obesity-Alliance-Primary-Care-Paper-FINAL.pdf

Coverage included:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-03-16-docsfightfat16_ST_N.htm”>http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-03-16-docsfightfat16_ST_N.htm

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/doctors-and-patients-not-talking-about-weight.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2010/03/you_get_weighed_at_the_doctors.html”>The Checkup – You get weighed at the doctor’s office. Then what?

Physician interactions with patients who are obese is a hot topic. Other recent stories include,

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/11/23/prsa1123.htm”>amednews: Obese patients say some doctors disrespectful :: Nov. 23, 2009 … American Medical News

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/health/16essa.html?scp=5&amp;sq=obesity&amp;st=cse”>Essay – For Obese People, Prejudice in Plain Sight – NYTimes.com

March 7, 2010

Social pressure keeps weight of Japanese women low…but not for men and children. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/04/AR2010030401436.html”>Big in Japan? Fat chance for nation’s young women, obsessed with being skinny – washingtonpost.com. Meanwhile, stress of White House bringing poor habits and excess weight to Obama advisor.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/07/us/politics/07axelrod.html?adxnnl=1&amp;hpw=&amp;adxnnlx=1267980789-auEREV8zyhS1D+W8ygEvBg”>David Axelrod, Obama’s Message Maven, Finds Fingers Pointing at Him – NYTimes.com

March 3, 2010

New study shows presence of multiple inflammation markers in  obese children as young as 3 years old. Inflammation is considered to cause long term damage to the heart. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194272?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=1″>Multiple Markers of Inflammation and Weight Status… [Pediatrics. 2010] – PubMed result

March 2, 2010

Childhood obesity continuing to increase http://www.usnews.com/health/family-health/childrens-health/articles/2010/03/02/child-obesity-rates-going-up.html”>Child Obesity Rates Going Up – US News and World Report  as children are seen as constantly eating. ttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6210HC20100302″>Snacks mean U.S. kids moving toward constant eating | Reuters Article exposes fallacy of addressing obesity by making “little changes.” http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/in-obesity-epidemic-whats-one-cookie”>In Obesity Epidemic, What’s One Cookie? – Well Blog – NYTimes.com. In the meantime, President Obama’s liking of burgers and smokes shows he’s a ‘regular guy.’ http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/category/the-44th-president”>THE 44TH PRESIDENT – The Caucus Blog – NYTimes.com

Survey provides reinforcement that most Americans think they are healthy…it’s the other guy who isn’t living a healthy lifestyle. http://yourtotalhealth.ivillage.com/most-americans-think-s-others-who-are-unhealthy.html?par=ivillage%3Ayth%3Aoutbrain”>Most Americans Think It’s Others Who Are Unhealthy – iVillage Your Total Health

The most recent study on mortality and obesity was published in February 2010 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19680230?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=4″>Individual and aggregate years-of-life-lost associ… [Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010] – PubMed result. The research by Eric Finkelstein et al found that overweight and low level obesity were not associated with a reduction in life expectancy. However, higher BMI levels are associated with reduced life expectancy. Overall, excess body weight is associated with 95 million Years of Life Lost (YLL). White females account for more than 2/3 of this amount. The authors predict that, unless the rising prevalence of those with BMIs over 35 is reduced, or improvements in medical care are made, overall life expectancy in the US will decrease. The article notes that the mortality rate for obesity might be higher if not for improved medical treatments. They note that 10 of the 25 most prescribed medications are for obesity related conditions.

February 28, 2010

USA Today story describes middle age weight losers hitting a brick wall. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2010-03-01-WLCstubbornweightloss01_CV_N.htm”>Middle-aged dieters hit a brick wall after 10 pounds or so – USATODAY.com

February 26, 2010

Institute of Medicine announces program to examine front-of-package nutrition labeling requirements. http://www.iom.edu/Activities/Nutrition/NutritionSymbols.aspx”>Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols – Institute of Medicine

 (Footnote:  About time! I raised the proposal for putting calorie information on the front of packaged foods in 2003. <ahttp://www.scribd.com/doc/1370463/US-Food-and-Drug-Administration-03n0338tr00002″>US Food and Drug Administration: 03n-0338-tr00002

February 25, 2010

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announces plan to combat obesity in California. http://californianewswire.com/2010/02/25/CNW6898_173852.php”>Ca. Gov. Schwarzenegger Announces Actions to Fight Obesity, Promote Healthy Living : Thu, 25 Feb 2010 : California Newswire™

February 23, 2010

President Obama’s health care proposal includes obesity

President Obama’s health care proposal, announced on before the ‘health care summit’ contains funding for state and local governments to develop strategies for chronic diseases “including those associated with obesity and tobacco use.” The proposal also promises “unprecedented investments in disease research and prevention” while at the same time requiring posting of calorie information in restaurants and in vending machines.

States and health care providers would receive evidence-based recommendations on preventive and “obesity-related” services for Americans on Medicaid. States will be encouraged to develop innovative childhood obesity preventive programs. Small businesses will be allowed to compete for grants to develop wellness programs through the CDC. For Medicare beneficiaries, annual wellness visits will be fully covered as well as personalized prevention plans. Co-payments for preventive care will be waived. http://www.whitehouse.gov/health-care-meeting/proposal/titleiv/communities”>Title IV. Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health | The White House

The Kaiser Family Foundation reports that the Administration bill does include the Safeway provision which could penalize employees who do not meet certain health standards, including weight. http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/housesenatebill_final.pdf”>http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/housesenatebill_final.pdf. The bill does not specify minimum benefit packages. There is no mention of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages.

February 21, 2010

New study by Kenneth Thorpe and Lynda Ogden in Health Affairs finds rising Medicare costs from chronic diseases, many related to obesity – hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, heart disease, liver disease, cancer, mental disorders and asthma. Spending has also shifted from inpatient hospital care to outpatient visits and drugs. Most all Medicare patients utilize these services http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.2009.0474v1″>Chronic Conditions Account For Rise In Medicare Spending From 1987 To 2006 — Thorpe et al., 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0474 — Health Affairs

February 20, 2010

First Lady Michelle Obama’s childhood obesity initiative (see http://letsmove.gov/”>Let’s Move)  produces attack from Glenn Beck   http://mediamatters.org/blog/201002120036″>Beck attacks Michelle Obama for trying to raise awareness of and combat childhood obesity | Media Matters for America  and defense from Mike Huckabee http://mediamatters.org/blog/201002190060″>Huckabee warns that “conservatives are going to” attack Michelle Obama’s obesity initiative — but Glenn Beck already has | Media Matters for America, See preview of Huckabee’s interview with Michelle Obama <a href=”http://www.foxnews.com/huckabee”>Huckabee – FOXNews.com

February 19, 2010

Harvard researchers wanted to look at childhood chronic health conditions over time to see what fluctuations, if any, took place. Chronic conditions were grouped into 4 categories: obesity, asthma, other physical conditions and behavior/learning problems. Three cohorts of children were examined: those born in 1988, 1994 and 2000. Rates of maternal obesity increased in each cohort. The prevalence of any chronic condition increased with each cohort. The study found remission in several chronic conditions, except for obesity which increased substantially over time. Associations were found between maternal obesity and any chronic condition and with minority race.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20159870?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=1″>Dynamics of obesity and chronic health conditions … [JAMA. 2010] – PubMed result

Researchers are increasingly looking at early life factors. A study of 1,100 children found that being female, having diabetes exposure in utero, larger size for gestational age, shorter breastfeeding duration and rapid infant weight gain predicted higher childhood BMI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19940472?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=3″>Early-Life Predictors of Higher Body Mass Index in… [Ann Nutr Metab. 2010] – PubMed result

February 16, 2010

The folks at the Economic Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture have come out with the Food Atlas, a comprehensive map down to the county level from fast food outlets to taxes. Check it out at <a href=”http://ers.usda.gov/foodatlas”>Food Environment Atlas. Thanks to a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the University of Wisconsin  has issued county health maps comparing the health in counties with others in the state. All counties in the United States are included, except for the District of Columbia which is left out. Cost is also left out as a factor in health care access. <a href=”http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/”>County Health Rankings

February 16, 2010

The debate over bariatric surgery for adolescents heats up http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/weight-loss-surgery-for-teens”>Weight Loss Surgery for Teens – Well Blog – NYTimes.com. Fueled by part by new study from Australia http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20145228?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=2″>Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in severel… [JAMA. 2010] – PubMed result

February 13, 2010

The Tipping Point for Childhood Obesity may be as young as 3 months to 2 years of age. In a new study published in the journal Clinical Pediatrics, researchers conducted a retrospective chart review of 184 children between 2 and 20. More than half the children became overweight before age 2 and all patients were obese or overweight by age 10. The authors note that food preferences are also set at an early age, probably by age 2. The rate of gain was approximately 1 excess BMI unit per year. The study indicates that the critical period for preventing childhood obesity is during the first 2 years and for many it may as little as 3 months of age. The study looked at two different socioeconomic groups and found the same pattern. Pediatricians were urged to take BMIs earlier and look for ‘small’ changes which can lead to obesity. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150210?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=2″>Identifying the “Tipping Point” Age for Overweight… [Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010] – PubMed result

Some positive news comes in another study showing that pre-school children exposed to 3 routines: regular evening family meals, adequate sleep and limited screen viewing had approximately 40% lower prevalence of obesity compared to those exposed to none of these routines.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20142280?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=12″>Household Routines and Obesity in US Preschool-Age… [Pediatrics. 2010] – PubMed result

Unfortunately, the effectiveness of weight loss interventions for children under 5 leave a lot to be desired. See two reviews: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxygw.wrlc.org/journal/123276888/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;SRETRY=0″>Systematic review of the effectiveness of weight management schemes for the under fives. M. Bond. 2010; Obesity Reviews – Wiley InterScience, and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxygw.wrlc.org/pubmed/20107458?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=13″>Interventions to prevent obesity in 0-5 year olds:… [Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010] – PubMed result

In addition, pediatricians may lose interest in weight management over time. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxygw.wrlc.org/pubmed/20080520?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=1″>Applying practice recommendations for the preventi… [Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010] – PubMed result

February 11, 2010

First Lady Michelle Obama launches national childhood obesity initiative http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/first-lady-michelle-obama-launches-lets-move-americas-move-raise-a-healthier-genera”>First Lady Michelle Obama Launches Let’s Move: America’s Move to Raise a Healthier Generation of Kids | The White House after President Obama signs Executive Memorandum calling for a plan on childhood obesity in 90 days. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/presidential-memorandum-establishing-a-task-force-childhood-obesity”>Presidential Memorandum — Establishing a Task Force on Childhood Obesity | The White House

February 4, 2010

Study finds workers with obesity pay for health insurance through lower wages

A new study has confirmed that obese employees with employer-provided health insurance are paid less that their peers because of higher health care costs. Stanford University researchers analyzed data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Longitudinal Survey of Your and the Medical Expenditure Panel survey. They found that, on average, obese employees with health insurance were paid $1.42 an hour less that non-obese workers. Women had a higher wage penalty than men. Women with obesity whose employers provided health insurance paid a wage penalty of $2.64. The article is  “The incidence of the healthcare costs of obesity,” by Jay Bhattacharya, M.D., Ph.D., and M. Kate Bundorf, Ph.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., in the 2009 <em>Journal of Health Economics</em> 28, pp. 649-658.

February 3, 2010

A new study from Europe indicates that a significant portion of persons with morbid obesity (Body Mass Index greater than 40)  are missing a section of their DNA. The authors from the Imperial College London and ten other European centers indicate that the missing DNA may have a dramatic effect on some people’s weight. Approximately seven in every thousand people with morbid obesity are missing some 30 genes. See Science Daily report at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100203131401.htm”>Some morbidly obese people are missing genes, shows new research. Abstract at http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7281/full/nature08727.html”>Access : A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2 : Nature
January 29, 2010

First Lady Michelle Obama, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Surgeon General Release National Call to Action on Obesity http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/obesityvision/obesityvision2010.pdf”

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/obesityvision/obesityvision2010.pdf.

 Most of the document is similar to other DHHS statements on  obesity but there is one new aspect. The report draws special attention to the role of obesity in mental illness and calls on the medical community to promote awareness about the connection between mental and addiction disorders and obesity (See the Research Section) and to consider weight neutral medications for persons with severe mental illness.

January 27, 2010

New research indicates physicians can be effective in achieving weight loss in persons with severe obesity.

A study out of Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, LA, indicates that, with training, primary care providers can achieve weight loss and reduction in metabolic factors with medical intervention alone. Among those who completed the study, 31% in the intensive medical intervention group achieved a weight loss of 5% or more and 7% achieved a 20% or more weight loss compared to 9% and 1% in the usual treatment group. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20101009?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=11″>

Nonsurgical weight loss for extreme obesity in pri… [Arch Intern Med. 2010] – PubMed result. The results come none too soon. A study from Ireland of 700 individuals with obesity over a BMI of 30, found the highest BMIs occurred among those who reported onset of overweight before age 15. The BMI group over 50 was notably younger and had higher metabolic problems. They also had lower rates of marriage and higher unemployment. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20100391?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=19″>BMI = 50 kg/m2 is associated with a younger age … [Public Health Nutr. 2010] – PubMed result

January 25, 2010

Fetal anomalies in children of mothers with obesity may be more due to diabetes than weight alone. High BMIs may be a surrogate for pregestational diabetes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxygw.wrlc.org/pubmed/20093901?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=13″>Fetal anomalies in obese women: the contribution o… [Obstet Gynecol. 2010] – PubMed result

UPDATED  CONSUMER SAFETY ALERT

January 23, 2010

The Food and Drug Administration has issued a consumer warning about counterfeit versions of Alli™ being sold over the Internet. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm198519.htm”>UPDATED Public Health Alert: Counterfeit Alli containing sibutramine

Obesity by any measure found to increase risk of ischemic stroke http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.proxygw.wrlc.org/pubmed/20093637?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum&amp;ordinalpos=1″>Race- and Sex-Specific Associations of Obesity Mea… [Stroke. 2010] – PubMed result

SAFETY ALERT:   FDA Issues Warning on Meridia.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has notified health care professionals of increased risk of heart attack and stroke for patients taking sibutramine, marked as Meridia by Abbott Labs. The FDA found increased risk in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease, stroke or transient ischemic attack, heart arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial disease or uncontrolled hypertension. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm198221.htm”>Meridia (sibutramine hydrochloride): Follow-Up to an Early Communication about an Ongoing Safety Review</a> European authorities have taken the drug, called Reductil in Europe,  off the market  citing the high prevalence of heart problems in persons with obesity many of which may be undiagnosed. <a href=”http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1245176/Obesity-drug-used-86-000-patients-suspended-heart-attack-fears.html”>Obesity drug used by 86,000 patients is suspended over heart attack fears | Mail Online<

Intervene earlier and more aggressively:  New recommendations for screening and intensive counseling for youths 6-18  get impetus from finding high lipid levels in adolescents. Almost back-to-back two government agencies have reinforced the need for earlier, more aggressive intervention in children and adolescents with obesity. The United States Preventive Services Task Force has updated its recommendation that clinicians screen children and adolescents between 6  and 18 years of age for obesity and refer those at risk to programs designed   to improve their weight status by utilizing three components:  counseling for weight loss or a healthy diet, for physical activity, and  behavioral management techniques such as goal setting and self monitoring. Moderate- to high-intensity programs involve more than 25 hours of contact with the child and/or the family over a 6-month period. Combining counseling with either sibutramine or orlistat was found to result in modest improvements for children age 12 and over.  http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspschobes.htm”>Screening for Obesity in Children and Adolescents. The recommendations and evidence statement are available at the journal Pediatrics web site, http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/peds.2009-1955v1?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;fulltext=obesity&amp;searchid=1&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;sortspec=date&amp;resourcetype=HWCIT”>Effectiveness of Weight Management Interventions in Children: A Targeted Systematic Review for the USPSTF — Whitlock et al., 10.1542/peds.2009-1955 — Pediatrics

On January 22, 2010 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 20.3% of adolescents aged 12-19 had abnormal lipid levels, a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Youths were overweight or obese had higher lipid rates than those with normal weight. Based solely on BMI, 32% of all youths should be candidates for lipid screening. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_wk.html”>MMWR – MMWR Weekly http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/weightloss/2009-10-06-doctors-obesity_N.htm” target=”_blank”>Physicians Getting Active on Obesity

Did you know 3,693 Americans become obese everyday? Check <a href=”http://www.downeyobesityreport.com/2009/09/fact-sheet-2-quick-facts/”>Quick Facts

Has America Reached its Tipping Point on Obesity?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IdtZ-GfFo8http://www.downeyobesityreport.com/wp-content/uploads//downey_youtube.jpg

The two most recent surgeons general, Dr. David Satcher, left, and Richard H. Carmona, center, join Morgan Downey, right, at the STOP Obesity Alliance panel discussion at the Newseum in September. The recommendations of the group will provide policymakers guidelines in dealing with obesity in forthcoming reform bills. http://www.stopobesityalliance.org/events/past-events/has-america-reached-its-tipping-point-on-obesity/STOP Obesity Alliance